Lost Monster Files is a cryptid bust

By | December 1, 2024

It would be awesome if there were no more faked-science TV shows. Back in 2017, I published a book on how amateur paranormal researchers pretend to do science. Around that time, there were so many TV and YouTube shows of people doing this – staging “investigations” using sciencey-looking gadgets and language and playing at being experts – that I couldn’t keep track of them all anymore. Unfortunately, they are still going strong.

Cryptozoology is my favorite fringe subject, but it’s not fringe anymore, it’s mainstream. We can credit Monster Quest and Finding Bigfoot for the current popularity of self-styled cryptozoologists looking for mystery creatures. The latest cryptid show is Lost Monster Files on Discovery channel based on the files of Ivan T. Sanderson. It’s not low budget, but it’s low on originality and almost insultingly dumb.

I realize that people want to be on TV and hope make a living doing stuff like this, but I argue that these shows make the audience less knowledgeable about the topic because of the dumbing-down of the presented scenarios, and the exceptionally poor content passed off as “facts”.

Recap

Episode 1 explored the Carolina Chupacabra and the content failed to include anything interesting or new except what they seemingly made up. A condensed show can hardly begin to explore the complex history of the legendary creature and its strange cultural evolution. However, all history and much of the interesting details were entirely ignored for a ridiculous plot and very silly conclusion.

Episode 2 covered Sanderson’s work on ABSMery (the study of abominable snowmen accounts). The cast goes to British Columbia to follow up on an old Sasquatch/Bigfoot account. They confuse us without enlightening or even entertaining us. They find nothing.

Episode 3 is on the Thunderbird where the team finds an eagle’s nest but concludes, laughably, that there might be a still-living Teratorn or unknown giant eagle here.

I took a break from watching the show because it was worthless to me. I was curious, however, so I binge-watched the (hopefully) last three episodes.

Bernard is ghosted

Episode 4 was on the Minnesota Iceman, or “wild man” as the show calls it. The Iceman was a very popular sideshow promoted by Frank Hansen in 1968 depicting a body of what people thought of as a “cave man” frozen in ice. The team, as usual, ignores much of the important parts of the tale – that the Iceman model that was used still exists, that Hansen made money off it, and that Sanderson conducted his inspection of the body with Bernard Heuvelmans. Mention of Heuvelmans is entirely absent from this show, even though his history is entwined with Sanderson’s. While these extractions were done for time limitations, it makes the cast appear clueless to those of us who know that actual history. For drama, one half of the cast goes to the old Hansen farm to look for the real Iceman body they believe is buried there. The other half goes to the remote location where Hansen supposedly shot the creature where they have an “infrasound” experience. (Again. They had a similar thing happen in episode 2, which was also dropped with no consideration). The best find they come up with is a footprint, which they do not show on camera in any detail, but gush over it, claiming it matches Sanderson’s information about the creature having a really big toe. They conclude with misguided blather about evolution connected to Denisovans. They totally don’t know what they are talking about.

Heuvelmans is entirely absent from this show
even though his history is entwined with Sanderson’s.

Deception island

Episode 5 sent the team to Kodiak Island in Alaska to find out about the Kodiak sea monster. This was probably the worst episode. It was boring and, tracking with all the other episodes, absurd in premise. Their suggestion is that a plesiosaur twice the size of a blue whale (just all sorts of wrong) could still be living in the offshore ocean trench. Really reaching for an exciting conclusion, they suggest that the chemicals dumped after WW2 could have caused a genetic mutant to appear as a monster 30 years later. Ironically, the episode closed with a voiceover of Sanderson talking about truth and deception.

The cave “dragon” final episode

Episode 6 took the cast into a cave in Arkansas where they actually found something! The subject cryptid was the Gowrow – a made-up legend of a giant, spiny backed lizard. What caught my attention for this was the appearance of a USGS hydrologist discussing groundwater. I’m certain his words were cut and edited to lose all meaning because the jumbled word salad spewed about aquifers and caves was rubbish. Summing up their misinformed ideas about how water moves underground, they suspected that the Gowrow creature was travelling between a surface pond and cave systems via underwater passageways (they erroneously called “the aquifer”). This is a well-worn and mistaken idea often proposed for lake monsters that large creatures use subterranean passageways (through rock) to the ocean. The average person doesn’t know how groundwater moves, and this episode shows that ignorance in spades.

“Finding all that water in [the cave] was a gamechanger,” says Brittany, who seems to be the one to say the most ridiculous things in the show. Caves are created by water and typically still have water in them because they are under the surface.

The team descends into a cave. The location is not shown, but the implicit suggestion is that they “found” it, and it’s unexplored. This is clearly false, because the cave is too large and accessible for it to be unknown. It is extremely dangerous for inexperienced people to go a mile into a cave system like this, and there were no safety precautions shown for white nose syndrome protocols.

They find evidence of an alligator in the cave. And, they actually find the alligator.

I searched for more information about an alligator discovered in a cave in Arkansas and found nothing. According to the show, they were 80 miles from natural alligator habitat. There is no way this animal was native to this cave because it was too cold to comfortably exist here. It seems likely that it was let loose here. I’m not saying it was planted, it could have been released by an irresponsible person, but I can’t trust anything on this show.

Common threads in the episodes

Over the six episodes, there were common threads:

  1. Oversimplification. In order to appeal to the non-technical viewer, to fit in an hour time frame, and to help the narrative, every scenario, find, and explanation was oversimplified, often to the extent that it was wrong. It was framed as “Sanderson studied this” + “There is a uptick in sighting of something like that in this area.” Therefore, “Sanderson was on to something, and we are going to just jump in and finish what he started.” This is a dull, banal, and misleading premise. Thus, my opinion is that this show makes people less well-informed on the topics covered.
  2. Lack of expertise. Almost no experts appeared in the show. As I noted in the first review, the cast were hardly what I would consider “experts”. They spoke unintelligently about complex topics like evolution, zoology, geography, and history. The writers and research team for this show did a poor job. Brittany, in particular, was not even coached on how to pronounce words correctly. For example, “Cuvier” as in Georges Cuvier, is pronounced “curvier”. Twice. There is no excuse for such sloppiness.
  3. Sham inquiry. I was entirely unconvinced that the investigation shown on screen was legitimate. It looked staged, heavily edited, and scripted to serve the pre-set narrative. This is typical of all paranormal nonfiction shows that attempt to portray a “scientific” approach, which instead shows the cast playing pretend scientist. It’s a cheap and lazy ploy.
  4. Extreme conclusions. The obviously weak and questionable evidence was hyped as convincing and used to bolster their pre-existing narrative that they were successful in showing that something mysterious was going on. That’s how an entertainment show is structured. This is not for educational purposes. But that message is not always understood by the audience.

In conclusion, this was a typical scientifical paranormal TV show with hype and no substance. It wasn’t even entertaining. For anyone who knows anything much about cryptids, this show was a total dud.

13 thoughts on “Lost Monster Files is a cryptid bust

  1. Randall Krippner

    Oh, my, what a mess! I’ve never seen this particular show but I am familiar with the genre and they all follow this same pattern. And, of course, at the conclusion of the show they never actually find anything. I’ve watched some of the “ghost” hunter shows and they use the same tactics to try to build up faked tension. There seems to be a whole cottage industry that’s sprung up selling “detectors” to would-be ghost hunters that are just as silly as the ghost hunters themselves are. And, of course, ultimately the ghost hunters never actually find anything either.

    Reply
  2. guerillasurgeon

    There was a relatively scientific scripted TV program AFAIK. It had teams of people in some sort of competition looking for Bigfoot and what have you. They had scientists who explained what evidence was to the various teams, and sent them out into the wild. Nothing came out of it except a bit of mild amusement for me when a team of supposed Native Americans came back with some Bigfoot hair – which turned out to be moss. I haven’t heard anything about it since then, I guess it wasn’t click baity enough

    Reply
      1. Judi

        Why do you block anybody who gives you proper information and invites you to a debate ?

  3. Kevin J. Guhl

    There’s a guy on the show who works at an alligator farm and somehow the team manages to have access to an alligator… hmmm.

    In an alternate universe, there’s a version of “The Lost Monster Files” that didn’t squander its excellent premise. They didn’t even succeed is emulating more successful shows about “investigators” that are already tired and patronizing. Expecting anyone on these programs to find something amazing is like expecting Gilligan to get off the island one of these days.
    (I am not including the TV movies!)

    Reply
    1. marcusgood

      It would not shock me if, in the tradition of recent ‘documentaries’, they deliberately put an animal into a distressing situation to generate content.

      Reply
  4. Richard Grigonis

    Hello Sharon:

    You might want to take a look at the pages on my site devoted to Ivan Sanderson, who I knew when I was a teenager: http://richardgrigonis.com/Ch01%20Prologue%20and%20On%20the%20Trail%20of%20Ivan%20Sanderson.html

    Tales of huge numbers of Sanderson files being carted away are considerably exaggerated.

    I am finishing up my biography of Ivan Sanderson that I’ve been working on since 2009.

    I was contacted by the producers of the Lost Monster Files series, and Tracy Walder, the CIA/FBI agent, interviewed me about Ivan via Zoom for the series, but I seem to have been edited out of the Minnesota Iceman episode. Hopefully, the video footage will appear in Season Two (if there is one). It would be supremely ironic if the only person connected with the series who knew Ivan was the only person edited out…!

    Reply
    1. Sharon A. Hill Post author

      I would not be surprised if the latter is what happened. They seem entirely careless. I also strongly doubt a second season. But who knows.

      Thanks for the comments and info! I’ll check it out.

      Reply
  5. Barbara

    I’m so discussed with such fake regards to portraying facts. Good actors but so fake. I’m not a professional but I can see edit errors and unrealistic unlogical acting. 1st if you really want to be authentic your would put cameras us pointing on you as well as outwards at same time running 24/7 – not just one you so you can act like there is something outside. 2nd if you believe this is true what you are doing – don’t patchwork the video to fit your story but stick with facts not to puff up your egos. 3rd we know you’re trying to fix stuff into a time slot but truth vs fiction is more than 30 minutes and good acting. Stop misleading people with false scare tactics. Don’t doctor the information to fit the storyline but share the full information as the storyline.

    Reply
  6. Larry

    What a scam. I’m an upstate New York hunter trapper. 2 tour Vietnam all these years and no body or Skeleton it’s like big foot no bodies Everyone is seeing this crap but still new positive report. Makes for the tv show to keep going with these lies. Wake up people

    Reply
  7. Kelly Motichka

    I LOVE the show…. not enough cryptid shows and I have my fingers crossed🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻 anxiously awaiting a second sy!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply (Comments may not be immediately approved.)